Friday, February 21, 2014

Latin American Women Artists in Bay Area - Research by Phuc Dinh


The original mural painted by Mujeres Muralistas on Balmy Alley. SFO
Photo: Patricia Rodriguez 

 ===============================================================  

ABSTRACT
Chicano Art Movement appeared in the United States during1960s and 1970s to struggle for social justice and protest against racial discrimination. Besides, Chicana artists also depicted their talents through collectives, murals, and individual paintings from groups and individuals to confirm their identity in community and American mainstream. They gradually developed artists’ activities into Chicana Art Movement to reveal the freedom of speech. In the American dominant mainstream and masculinity dominant tradition, Chicana artists tried the best by hardworking for art works and continuingly influenced the community and the country.  first, murals were crucial in the Latin American communities; second, people need to know about activities of Latina in art works.  From these art works shown by groups as Mujeres Muralistas and Co-Madres Artistas in California and individual artists throughout the country, we were informed that numerous scholarly Chicana artists have worked tirelessly for racial equality as well as for Chicana feminism movement. We also knew that their widespread had profound religious beliefs; however, modern Chicana artists used to protest against traditional gender hegemony by their art works. Nevertheless, Latin Americans have conducted the society through symbolic religious objects and sacred images that helped extra elements to American art. Finally, Chicana artists have confirmed their stances and sexualities by their talents in art. In fact, most of them possessed high degrees in Art colleges and became effective in art works which would support for future feminist movements.
***********
 Why Did Chicana Art Movement Appear?
Paco's Tacos mural at 24th and South Van Ness, originally painted to give Paco a competitive edge when McDonald's was opening a block away. The wall is no longer there, covered now by a new building.
Photo: Patricia Rodriguez
Chicano/a art arose at the end of 1960s as part of the Chicano/a movements, a national political and social mobilization of Latin ethnicities. Initiated and led by farm workers, student activities, third party electorates, disposed land grant owners, and critics of police brutality, Chicana art has been merged as Latin American women artists of the United States and   influenced the American cultural diversity in mass media. The research aimed to clarify Chicana and Latina artists might turn to Chicana artists’ movement and feminists, for example, the liberation movements, the feminists in the groups Mujeres Muralistas and Co- Madres artistas who contributed their performances by murals and individual paintings to confirm Latina identity in Latino/a communities for protesting against racial hegemony in the United States. Especially, they would be merged in the flag of Chicano Movement calling for social justice. Latina artists in the United States were numerous; majority of them had high education and wanted to be capable to struggle for women’s rights and for serving feminist movement. Also, Chicana feminist artists profoundly stated social problems of race, class, gender and patriarchy hegemonies in their paintings; and consequently, they used visual works to depict their ideas against the masculinity hegemony theory in churches. Some authors criticized that they protested against traditional commercial stereotypes of Latina women even they were encountered by their communities. Although Chicana artists movements were limited by hegemonic masculinity, they made all efforts to confirm their identities in sexuality, gender, race and even in education.

What Was The Theory to Apply for Critical Analysis in The Research?
First, a series of key terms relevant to the research should be defined; for example, Chicano and Chicana- Mexican male and female, murals - a large picture painted or affixed directly on a wall or ceiling, Mujeres Muralistas – group of Latina  and  Chicana artists who made formal performances in public in 1974 with large murals for the Mission Model Cities organization , Co-Madres Artistas – Chicana artists’ collective organization  which was based in Sacramento and led by Lerma Barbosa with others like Carmel Castillo, Laura Llano, Mareia de Socorro, and Helen Villa, and Lucy Montoya Rhodes , Latinoamerica – the mural painted by the Mujeres Muralistas exhibited in 1974 in Francisco,  Our  Lady – a small photo based digital print by Alma Lopez in 1999 which caused a huge controversy in Santa Fe, New Mexico in 2001, The Virgin of Guadalupe – drawn by artists such as Ester Hernandez, Yolanda Lopez, Alma Lopez that represented differently to the origin.  These terms extracted from the sources of my research including books and in the articles in the database of the King Library in San Jose. First, I will use the books published by scholars who have been teaching at schools or at universities. Next, I will use articles written by scholars and published in the databases of the San Jose State University Library. All articles are peer reviewed. Third, the audience of this research will be the professor of my class who works in the Social Science Department at SJSU and the peers who are my classmates.
Balmy Alley is located in the Mission District in San Francisco, California. The block long alley is the best place to see the most concentrated collection of murals in San Francisco.
 the Murals (Wall Paintings)
http://www.balmyalley.com/Welcome.html                           
 The books used in the research would be the primary sources. First, it was the Creative Collectives: Chicana Painters Working in Community published in 2003 by Maria Ochoa who is currently a professor of Social Science at San Jose State University. Next book was the Chicana and Chicano Art published in 2009 by Carlos Francisco Jackson who is currently an assistant professor in the Chicana/o Studies Program and is Director of Taller Arte del Nuevo Amanecer, a community art center in Woodland, California.
Also, I would extract several articles through the database of the library of San Jose State University. King Library is a library of the San Jose State University which uses OmniFile Full Text Mega a database which provides a wide range of resources of researches. The database is useful for researches of women’s studies, ethnic studies, art, education, social sciences and more other fields. For my research, I would focus art and social sciences to look for relevant articles. These relevant articles were written by the authors who analyzed, reviewed for Chicana artists and Latino/a artist movements by visual presentations from the late 1960s to 2000s.  Most of these articles were used to invoke for   Chicana stereotypes and Chicana sexualities protesting against political and traditional effects.  Finally, the audience to this research would be my class and finally the course lecturer. My course lecturer would be the consultant, the guide and also the final grader to the research. Professor Maria Ochoa has worked in the Department of Social Science in the University and lectured three other courses including Women, Race & Class, Internship, and Women and Minorities in the Social Science Department. She has currently published two more books including Shout Out: Women of Color Respond to Violence, an Anthology of Creative Expression, co-edited with Barbara K. Ige, published in 2008.
Chicana artists groups and single Chicana artists, they mostly desired to confirm their identities in the American society

Dr.  Maria Ochoa the author of Creative Collectives: Chicana Painters Working in Community,   
Two groups of Chicana artists in northern regions of California and their art movements
History of Latina artists in California was proud of the activities of Mujeres Muralistas and Co-Maderes Artitstas, the female Latin artists groups who contributed murals, paintings on walls, in the regions of Oakland, San Francisco, Bay Area and Sacramento Valley.  According to Maria Ochoa the author of Creative Collectives: Chicana Painters Working in Community, these Chicanas had used their art works for serving their ideas to protest against “the hegemony of mainstream culture” (Ochoa 2003, 1). Furthermore, Ochoa described their activities were desire to reveal their identity by self- distribution the mainstream society. However, “tenacity”, (Ochoa 2013, xv) was the most important quality for them to obtain influenced art works in California and some different states in the United States. Their talents were seen by several public exhibitions, for example, the Art/Women/California, 1950-2000: Parallels and Intersections, showed at the San Jose Museum of Art in 2002.  In this event, numerous skillful Chicana artists such as Irene Perez, Patricia Rodriguez, and Ester Hernandez who attended the exhibition with nearly hundred other female artists (Ochoa 2003, xvi). For series public exhibitions, they became infamous in community, the state, as well as the nation. The successes bounded broader to public and lined a pathway for Chicana feminist movements as a power of an “indigenous deity” but which can threaten the “Roman Catholic orthodoxy” (Ochoa 2003, xvi).
To merge into the liberation movement, Chicana artists had to unify together to struggle against masculinity hegemony, a traditional hierarchy in Latino culture. According to Ochoa, Cesar E. Chavez, a popular labor organizer of union, unified minorities in California and enhanced the Chicanas’ role. Unfortunately, men in Chicano movement didn’t promote these advantages to develop the Liberation Movement. Masculine hegemony was the main tradition to resist Chicanas to enter Latino/a movement. Ochoa analyzed this weakness:
The material and representational space allocated to Chicanas permitted a limited range of roles, primarily having to do with domestic matters, in particular with the servicing of Chicano’s needs. Chicana who questioned these aspects of the movement suffered the consequences of their feminist analyses by being labeled vendidas (sellouts) or agabachadas (anglicized). (Ochoa 2003, 18)

    Gender stereotype were persistent impediments for Chicanas to dedicate their movement and blocked the feminist critiques. Doleres Huerta, Enriqueta Longeaux Vasquez and Marta Cotera, were activists, scholars and columnists who criticized the gender dominance had occupied in the Chicano movement. Furthermore, unified Chicana feminists had to voice against who prohibited Chicanas in their “dual positionality” (Ochoa 2003, 19). Indeed, Chicanas were capable to struggle in the “duality” as Nieto Gomez proclaimed, “I support my community and I do not ignore the women in my community” (Ochoa 2003, 19). Thus, it was possible for two groups Mujeres Muralistas and Co-Madres Artistas to conform their dual stands as feminists.
            During 1970s there were many Mexican women artists who claimed themselves as muralistas who were warmly interested in painting on wall as the so- called murals. According to the author, Graciela Carrillo, Irene Perez, and Patricia Rodriquez, these core artists painted many prominent murals such as Latinoamerica, Para el Mercado, and Rhomboidal Parallelogram. These murals were enjoyed and appreciated by audience during exhibitions. In fact, murals were created by much of labor and enthusiasm of these Chicana artists as Ochoa described:
The technical logistics and representational concerns of mural painting, compounded by the nuanced personal interactions among the artists, contribute to an ever-widening series of communicative process…the ongoing commentary as audiences respond to the mural and communicate their likes and dislikes, concerns for accuracy of detail, and suggestions or additions to the work. (Ochoa 2003, 34)
    Obviously, they invested too many efforts for a variety roles to each project; for example, their art works must deal with all weather conditions, physical conditions for processing work as climbing, carrying, crossing dangerous scaffolding and assembling or disassembling it. Furthermore, they had to possess a number skills to adapt with the needs of food, music, dancing and how the option of blessing or invocation in exhibitions. Generally, these Chicana artists obtained high education in art for such complicated works; for example, the core group of these Muralistas had attended Art College in San Francisco before creating these murals.
            The core group of these Chicana artists also worked based on corporation and helping each other to expand their activities for the feminist movement. They created a manifesto which presented as a new face of a movement other than simply a Chicana artists group. For this aspect, Ochoa explained, “The manifesto’s concluding language, ‘We offer you colors we make,’ deserves attention because it conjures the Mexican tradition of la ofrenda,” (Ochoa 2013, 37); furthermore, through the interviews in the visits to the exhibitions, Ochoa noted numerous details about the Mujeres Muralistas; for instance, they expanded the murals beginning in 1973 in Balm Alley in Bay Area where it looked like a monument including variety murals. Also, there was another mural site at the Mission District in San Francisco. As a result, until 1993, sixty five murals in an area of twenty seven blocks could be seen over Balm Alley and Mission District. The Mujeres Muralistas gradually expanded its dimension of the art works by mixing personal efforts with collaborated efforts for vast murals; for example, the Latinoamerica was painted by the Mujeres Muralistas in 1974 in acrylic on masonry with the dimension of 20’ x 76’ and the Para el Mercado was completed in 1974 with acrylic on wood in dimension of 24’ x 76’ (Ochoa 2003, 96-102). 
The Mission District may be ethnically mixed, but the Inner Mission (roughly the area from Potrero on the east to Dolores Street on the west, and Chavez Street on the south to 20th or 21st Street on the north) is dominated by Latino culture [by Timothy W. Drescher]
Fantasy World for Children
Besides Latinoamerica and Para el Mercado, two other notable murals were Rhomboidal Parallelogram and Fantasy World for Children.  Rhomboidal Parallelogram was painted by Mendez, Perez, Rodriguez, and Hernandez. This mural was constructed in six panels for painting, ten feet high and thirteen feet long. It was exhibited at the San Francisco Art Festival in 1975. Next, the Fantasy World for Children was painted in Mini-Park a block from La Galeria de La Raza on Balmy Alley. Perez, Carrillo, and Rodriguez were collaborated to create this mural. These artists painted a magical topography having children of color, jaguars and dinosaurs, snakes, flamingos, sea turtles etc. (Ochoa 2003, 54-55). As Ochoa described, the Latinoamerica and three other collectives deserved to be seen as a “celebratory rather than a critique of Latina/o cultures” (Ochoa 2003, 53); also, they desired to present spirits of Latina/o families, efforts, capacity and roles of Mexican women who deserved to be honored and taken the legacy from their works. Although these murals were gradually disappeared by changes of homeowners, each of them had involved in Chicano Art Movements to keep commitment and to strengthen their creative abilities for Chicana feminists in the mainstream. Finally, by devotion spirit and creation ability as in their manifesto “we offer you colors we make”, the Mujeres Muralistas had completed popular murals that no one would underestimate the tenacity of them.
            While the group Mujeres Muralistas had high education in art and had organized themselves for successful exhibitions in San Francisco and Bay Area, the group Co-Madres Artistas succeeded in featuring more than fifty three exhibitions during ten years from 1992 to 2002. Working together and corporation, they intended to perform numerous collective exhibitions in a year. The collaboration helped the group “alleviated much of the pressure” as in individual exhibitions (Ochoa 2003, 80). This group lived around Sacramento and was directed by Irma Lerma Barbosa the painter of Warriors of the New Day and Chiapas Madonna which presented as her famous paintings.  According to Ochoa, Barbosa had six other Chicana artists to be her participants in muralistas group for the exhibition during the winter 1992. Similarly to the Mujeres Muralistas, the Co-Madres Aritistas dedicated to community with the manifesto as “We Belong to the Community”, they aimed the success leaned on participation for social involvement to each individual skill; for example, although Lucy Montoya Rhodes wasn’t an artist, her administrative skill had benefited the group of the first exhibition in 1992. Furthermore, this group possessed advantages due to the self- reliance quality; for instance, the Co-Madres Artistas found the way to increase funding by mailing lot of brochures for expanding exhibitions. Clearly, they belonged together for common success in their murals and individual paintings; for example, each year they succeeded five collective exhibitions; furthermore, working together, they avoided inabilities and pressures of individual exhibition to handle more complicated works for completing on time. Their art works succeeded thanked to the contribution of Rhodes who was skillful administrator for the group as Castillo recalled, “She was a glue that kept us together. She did so much then. She still does. She calls us up and ask what she can do” (Ochoa 2003, 81). Thus, union was crucial to their activities, and collaboration was the strength for them to continue art exhibitions until 2002.
Chicana Feminists and Sexuality
            It might be questionable about the motivation for these groups to work in such lacking of financing.  According to Carlos Francisco Jackson the author of Chicana and Chicano Art, Chicana artists desired to become feminists for “breaking social norms and stereotypes” (Jackson 2009, 114) rather than to make livings and benefits for families. Second, Chicana artists wanted to struggle against a paradoxical theory which Chicanos said to support the elimination to racial oppression in American society, but they refused Chicanas’ corporation. Moreover, Chicana feminists wanted to protest against what Chicanos had weakened them. Jackson gave an example that was at the Crusade for Justice’s First Chicano Youth Liberation Conference in 1969, a  number Chicanas protested for sexual equality in the conference; especially, they requested the termination of the “machismo” who used to attacked Chicanas with negative terms as “Women’s Libbers” or “aggringadas” and treated Chicanas as “vendidas”, or trators (Jackson 2009, 114). It was time for Chicanas to speak up because they have endured simultaneous racial discrimination in the mainstream and the gender dominance in the tradition. Alica Gaspar de Alba a Chicana scholar explained that the radical, liberal, and Marxist feminists in the liberation movement of middle class women were named as “white” feminism since they looked Chicana feminism as a “form of third world feminism” (Jackson 2009, 114). The stereotype led Chicana feminists to place class and race as critical issues since they recognized their identities  were clearly attached to “language and culture, of nationality and citizenship, of autonomy and choice” (Jackson 2009, 114).
Latinoamérica mural on Mission Street midway between 25th and 26th, 1974.
Photo: Patricia Rodriguez
 Chicana artists preferred emphasizing central position of Chicanas through their murals. Nevertheless, they occasionally confirmed the identity whichever was contrarily to traditional norms. Visualizing the Latinoamerica , Ochoa commented the Chicana mural had intended to put women playing a “central role throughout the mural” (Ochoa 2003, 50). She added the mural nearly showed a newer sense in image about Chicana sexuality implying a rebellion within the image. In addition, this mural showed a new range of Latina/o ethnic mixing as African descent. She noted that the mural had a little sense of androgyny and lesbian; nevertheless, she concluded it presented peacefully a Chicanas’ aesthetic expression. However, eventually Chicana artists turned to the opposition against traditional prejudices, for example, about La Malinche who was blamed as a traitor woman in Mexican culture and about Eva who was seen as a sin in Christian notion (Jackson 2009, 115). According to Jackson, La Malinche was an Aztec slavery who served Spanish conquistador Hernan Cortes as an interpreter, an advisor and even a lover. She had a son with Cortes. However, after Mexican revolution she was blamed as a traitor in Mexican culture. Influenced by the story, Santa Barraza a Chicana artist painted several paintings defending La Malinche against the stereotype; for instance, in her La Machinche, she implied  Machinche as a “generous and forgiving who bore and nurtured a new strong race, an American hybrid” (Jackson 2009, 115). The contesting idea implied in this painting used to encounter masculinity hierarchy a chronic oppression to Mexican women. Furthermore, other Chicana artists in the mid-1970s used paintings to oppose stereotyped figures to Mexican women and Mexican American women in religion. Yolanda Lopez and Ester Hernandez, two prominent images of Chicana art movement, repainted the Virgin of Guadalupe differently in active images to encourage Mexican women to break traditional limits in women’s roles and expectations; Jackson explained:
In the first piece, Lopez presents herself as the Virgin, running with her smiling face erect, in contrast to the Virgin’s traditional solemn and downward-looking pose. . . .Lopez depicts herself holding a snake tightly in one hand while stepping on and crushing the angel, whom Lopez has described as a symbol of patriarchy. (Jackson 2009, 117)

            Similarly, Betty LaDuke in the Feminine Studies, she examined Latina art works of Yolanda Lopez which implied the breaking of tradition and resistant boundary for interacting emotional feelings with social conceptions. The author added that Yolanda Lopez’s art was “driven by love, rage, and a sense of irony” (LaDuke 1994, 117). Similar to the activities of Chicana artists of the Mujeres Muralistas, Yolanda Lopez found her art life tended to street galleries. Lopez was impressed by traditional masculinity hegemony that led her to intensive political activities through three large paintings. First, she titled the Three Generations of Mujeres for three images of daughter, mother and grandmother because she argued, “Each woman addresses the fact she is being observed” (LaDuke 1994, 117), for example, Lopez described her Grandmother Victoria F. Franco in her Guadalupe image for she argued the subject of art must be in lives not in myths. Second, due to her argument, Lopez developed new step within her graduate project which was a series of A Don & Va Chicana? (Where Are You Going Chicana?) which painted her as a runner with shorts and a T-shirt which intensively called her a power and disciplined body for Chicanas’ psychological and physical endurance. Lopez stated that endurance was a most important issue for survival against traditional oppression. She also considered ancient goddess was not suppression but transform; as a result, she used radiating light around the Guadalupe and transformed her mother with perfect compassion. Obviously, she aimed new role models as Chicanas desired. Finally, she had a goal that three portraits of her grandmother, her mother and herself presented for working class women, old women, young and middle women who required social attention.
  "Our Lady" by Alma Lopez ©1999  
This small (measuring only 14" x 17.5") photo-based digital print was the focus of a huge debate in Santa Fe, New Mexico in 2001. Since then, America Needs Fatima (ANF) has stalked this image and harrassed the museums and universities where it has been exhibited. Most recently, ANF organized a protest at the Oakland Museum and incited conservative Catholics in Cork County, Ireland to protest the exhibition of Our Lady at the University College Cork. quoted from : http://almalopez.net/ORindex.html
           Chicana art works not only aimed to social and political issues but also aimed to depict Latina American sexualities. According to Jackson, Alma Lopez, a contemporary Chicana artist, mostly used digital technologies to revise traditional Mexican and Mexican American images which showed the endurance of Chicanas and queers. She was a talented and skilled painter as well as an enthusiastic activist in Mexican American community. The Tattoo was her digital print exhibited in 1999 with the description of a woman having a large tattoo of the Virgin of Guadalupe in a whole “set against the backdrop of a typical U.S.-Mexico border fence and the Los Angeles metropolitan skyline” (Jackson 2009, 117). Furthermore, as a Chicana artist she frequently painted her Virgin of Guadalupe everywhere as Luz Calvo wrote in the Meridians: feminism, race, transnationalism:
She is painted on car windows, tattooed on shoulders or backs, emblazoned on neighborhood walls, and silk-screened on t-shirts sold at local flea markets. Periodically, her presence is manifested in miraculous apparitions: on a tree near Watsonville, California; on a water tank, a car bumper, or a freshly made tortilla.(FN1)She is sorrowful mother, a figure who embodies the suffering of Chicano/a and Mexican populations in the context of colonization, racism, and economic disenfranchisement. (Calvo 2004, 201)

        While the Catholic Church deployed the image of the Virgin of Guadalupe for the “regressive sexual politics” (Calvo 2004, 201), Chicana feminists used the images to oppose and protest against colonization, economic exploitation and even sexual regression. As a Chicana lesbian artist, Lopez applied semiotics in digital technology to oppose traditional meanings of the Virgin. She thought the First Amendment, the right for freedom of speech, was for her to reveal her opinion in the public; first for cultural identity and second for queer and feminist Chicana art. In her Our Lady, she wanted to reform the Virgin of Guadalupe including feminism and queer movement into Chicana artists’ movement. Being a feminist, she proclaimed the comments to the original image of the Virgin; for example, Virgin’s hands posed in praying but her eyes drooping down, Virgin’s long sleeved gown from neck to toe and stood upon a crescent moon. Surprisingly, Our Lady had very significant changes to the original version with “draws attention to the brown female body by exposing…her legs, arms, and midriff bare”, and importantly she changed the Virgin’s stance with the hands now on the hips and “her gaze cast forward defiantly” (Calvo 2004, 204). However, like two earlier Chicana feminist artists as Yolanda Lopez and Ester Hernandez, Lopez had to encounter many protests and still controversy due to the issues of Our Lady. As content, Calvo stated, “Lopez’s art poses a critique and challenge that is about more than free speech or even equal rights” (Calvo 2004, 203). Furthermore, the author explained that Lopez desired the brown skinned Guadalupe in her Our Lady since of the consequence of racial hierarchies and colonial legacies. Lopez also emerged from her visual arts as challenged interaction of sexuality, race, class and gender. Guisela Latorre called Lopez’s images as “Chicana queer aesthetic” because Lopez’s images intended to challenge public and encountered the rejection from traditional Chicano/a organizations. However, Latorre explained:
Lopez’s work centers on a feminist and queer re-thinking of traditional Mexican icons, many of which are imbued with a deeply ingrained patriarchal discourse. The Virgin of Guadalupe-a popular symbol of Mexican /Chicana/o spiritual and cultural resistance from the seventeenth century to the present-has become the object of feminist critique among Chicana artists since 1970s. (Latorre 2008, 132-133)

Yolanda López
Portrait of the Artist as the Virgin of Guadalupe

Date: 1978

Size: 32" X 24"

Medium: oil pastel on paper

Collection of the artist

Click here to see a poster of the Lopez's drawing
Lopez thought the Virgin of Guadalupe culturally depicted an image of ideal woman with asexuality, passiveness and submissiveness as reasons for Lopez to exhibit her Our Lady additionally the Lupe & Sirena in Love and the Encuentro (Calvo 2004, 203-213).
 Higher education in Art was necessary for Chicana artists for development and comprehension to aesthetic career and art skill. Although aesthetical education was available earlier for Anglo women at the beginning of the twentieth century, it was available for Chicanos and Chicanas during the middle decades (Ochoa 2003, 27). Relating art education of art, Ochoa recommended that Chicanas artists should make efforts to obtain higher education at art colleges where Chicanas could obtain art skills and meet together. Chicano/a art was appreciated in the art world since it was distinguished from Western or European art. Chicana artists as Mujeres Muralistas and Co-Madres Artistas and numerous other Chicana American artists have confirmed their stances in the aesthetic diversity of the United States.
Race, Class, Sexuality and Gender Patriarchy in  Chicana Art Works
In the review for The Politics of Spiritual and Aesthetic Altarities written by Laura Perez an Associate Professor in Latino/a studies, Gloria Feman Orenstein described all Chicana artists studied deeply their native traditions and formed in minds the blending identities of “hybridization and reinterpretation” (Orenstein 2009, 120) in the United States a country without traditional patriarchies. This was better opportunities for them to depict their talents in art and reveal their desires in politics, culture, and identity. Therefore, they eventually wanted to create a new political spirit as a culture of “non-sexist, non-homophobic, non-racist, non-classist, non-patriarchal” (Orenstein 2009, 120). Furthermore, in the Our Lady, the goddesses Lopez would be reinterpreted, but female deities did not came from Western and European traditions. As a Chicana artist lesbian, Lopez revealed her sexuality without a shame. She exhibited the art works both in visuals and words thanks to technology and media distributions until a day people recognized the voices of “those who are employed in positions of servitude or the closeted…lives of homosexuals, lesbians, transvestites, and other gender benders (Orenstein 2009, 122). Similarly, Calvo wrote that Chicana lesbian artists claimed the Virgin of Guadalupe since they wanted to protest their traditional Chicano/a culture. However, most of Chicana feminists argued that the Virgin implied our mother who stood over all things or “racism, sexual violence, economic injustice, and, even, homophobia” (Calvo 2004, 208).
Similarly, Ochoa wrote that several alliances called “women of color” would come along with Chicana feminists, a term edited in the book This Bridge Called My Back by a couple of lesbian feminists Anzaldua and Cherrie Moraga who were called “cross-cultural feminist alliances” (Ochoa 2003, 21). Also, the members of Mujeres Muralistas and Co-Madres Artistas were ready to ally with other women of color to enhance Chicana artists movement. Hence, a collective might combined from other women of color artists but still be called Chicana. Indeed, from alliance with other women of color, Chicana artists would suggest for political rather than focus on biological and cultural since all women of colors would prefer participating with Chicana artists for common struggles in “ imagined communities” (Ochoa 2003, 22).
Conclusion  
            Mexican American culture had a long history in American society before Anglo Protestant culture came with the United States. However, the idea that Mexican Americans were assimilated by Anglo Protestant culture was dominant. According to Jackson, the Chicano movement emerged at the increase of Vietnam War during 1960s, and until 1969 Chicano activists began merging with Chicano movement to protest against the Vietnam War. Therefore, numerous Chicano/a artists also emerged at these movements.  With huge efforts in collectives, murals, and individual paintings, the Chicana artists groups and individuals have claimed the identities of Latin American women within Chicana/o Art Movement and communities. They also proved enormous ability, talent, power, and even tenacity for numerous successes in education and exhibition. Chicana paintings have depicted Chicano/a culture and implied a Chicana feminist movement struggling against dominance of race, gender in traditional culture and in mainstream diversity. In addition, Chicana lesbian artists claimed their sexuality under the freedom of speech which is respected constitutionally. These Chicanas will convert to Chicana feminists for simultaneous struggles against racism, sexism and gender stereotypes like Ochoa stated that they didn’t name themselves feminists, but their works obviously positioned them like Chicanas who worked outside traditional system. Chicanas should try more efforts to escape the three burdens of gender, color, and not being westerners, first to surpass Chicano artists catching a higher position in the mainstream art. Also,   Chicana artists should rely on higher education in the United States for understanding well the Western artistry to have outstanding art works which would combine Western art and their traditional art. Moreover, as Henkes recommended, Chicana/o artists should not have to cling to cultural traditions in art because they should blend for a universal enjoying. Eventually, they would obtain worldwide exhibitions for their painting as a means to extend their feminist movement universally. Individual art works belong to Yolanda Lopez, Alma Lopez, for example, had distinctive exhibitions as new voices of Chicanas in modern time as an effective feminist movement for Mexican women against traditional Mexican culture in which Chicanas have endured long oppressions. Besides individual paintings, the Chicanas’ murals, as Ochoa proclaimed, were also the spiritual art works which contributed everywhere in public where numerous people would pass by, but they might make more effectiveness for the Chicana Art Movement. In brief, Chicana artists could create strategic successes in people’s hearts through popular arts to support Chicana/o Art Movement to claim and confirm their identities. However, Chicanas’ exhibitions and contributions to their paintings still remained largely neglected by Chicano and American art centers and institutions that required Chicanas and Mexican American women artists to expand their art works into American media and international for greater support from American feminists and social activists in the mainstream.
Words Count: 5025
Bibliographies
Calvo, Luz. "Art Comes for the Archbishop: The Semiotics of Contemporary Chicana
   Feminism and the Work of Alma Lopez." Meridians 5, no. 1(2004): 201-224 OmniFile
 FullText Mega (H.W. Wilson), EBSCOhost (accessed April 11, 2013).
Ebsco. “Provides a Wealth of Resources for all core subjects”. OmniFile Full Text Mega.
Full Text Mega (H.W. Wilson), EBSCOhost (accessed May 13, 2013). Achieved from
http://www.ebscohost.com/public/omnifile-full-text-mega
Jackson, Carlos Francisco. Chicana and Chicano Art: Protest Arte/ Carlos Francisco
 Jackson. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press, 2009.
Laduke, Betty. 1994. "Yolanda Lopez: Breaking Chicana stereotypes." Feminist Studies 20, no.
 1: 117. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed May 8, 2013).
Latorre, Guisela. "Icons of Love and Devotion: Alma López's Art." Feminist Studies 34,
 no. ½ (2008): 131-150. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed May 8, 2013).
Ochoa, Maria. Creative Collective: Chicana Painters Working in Community.
            Albuquerque: New Mexico University Press, 2003.
Ochoa, Maria del Carmen. Department of Social Science. (Accessed May 11, 2013).
Achieved from http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/socs/ochoa.htm
Orenstein, Gloria Feman. 2009. "Review of Chicana Art." Femspec 10, no. 1: 120-122.
            OmniFile Full Text Mega (H.W. Wilson), EBSCOhost (accessed May 13, 2013).

This research was written and submitted by Phuc Dinh to Social Science Department of San Jose State University in May 2013.
 ============================================================== 
APPENDIXES

MUJERES MURALISTAS

Latinoamerica 

Latinoamérica mural on Mission Street midway between 25th and 26th, 1974.
Photo: Patricia Rodriguez

“The Mujeres Muralistas made its formal public appearance in 1974 with a large mural painted for the Mission Model Cities organization, located at Mission and 25th Streets. Consuelo was approached by a friend who worked at Mission Model Cities and asked if we could design and paint a mural representing Latinos in the Mission District. The organization gave us $1,000 for the whole project. Consuelo, Graciela, Irene, and I got together and decided to accept the invitation. The four of us met at our home in Balmy Alley and brainstormed a design. Our house became the central headquarters of the Mujeres Muralistas. . .”-
by Patricia Rodriguez, from her essay "Mujeres Muralistas," in the anthology "Ten Years That Shook the City: San Francisco 1968-78" (City Lights Foundation: 2011), edited by Chris Carlsson.


"Our Lady" by Alma Lopez ©1999
Our Lady controversy continues
This small (measuring only 14" x 17.5") photo-based digital print was the focus of a huge debate in Santa Fe, New Mexico in 2001. Since then, America Needs Fatima (ANF) has stalked this image and harrassed the museums and universities where it has been exhibited. Most recently, ANF organized a protest at the Oakland Museum and incited conservative Catholics in Cork County, Ireland to protest the exhibition of Our Lady at the University College Cork.”- Alma Lopez
Lopez, Alma. “Our Lady controversy continues”. Almalopez.com.
I

CO-MADRES ARTISTAS
Warriors of the New Day - 1993, Oil on canvas, 5' X 4'
Irma Barbosa
Stories are the spirit threads passed on from generation to generation. They are the means of learning. The stories passed on by our elders were meant to guide and develop morals and values. My art takes you on a pilgrimage to mythical places and tells you stories of innocence, beauty, and pure passion. The universality of the earth Mother theme is utilized within much of my work to communicate that every individual is responsible for his words as he affects the earth and all people ... that each person is a walking story .. and that we are all connected.


No comments:

Post a Comment

CHUYỆN CÁI RẪY KHỔ ĐAU VÀ NHỚ THƯƠNG NHỮNG NGƯỜI EM VỢ ...

CHUYỆN CÁI RẪY KHỔ ĐAU VÀ NHỚ THƯƠNG NHỮNG NGƯỜI EM VỢ ... Thôi đúng rồi! Ngọn lửa bốc lên từ đằng cái khe nhỏ nơi những thợ săn Tân Thắng...